I have been saving up this piece for a while, but now feel so irritated that I have to get it out. Over recent weeks and months it has been brought to my attention that tattoos still have this massively out-dated stigma attached to them. Why should this be the case?
I’ve been doing a bit of homework about the history of tattooing and the truth may surprise many of you. Tattooing is as old as the human species themselves. If you look at the rock carvings of Northern Africa, North America, Mesopotamia, Asia and Australia there are human figures with what appears to be tattoos and body modifications on them. It is commonplace all over the world for tribe-members to be adorned with jewellery, piercings and tattoos. It was only truly discovered by the British when travelling overseas in around the 1700s to colonise as many areas as possible.
These sailors often kept journals detailing images of these heavily-tattooed peoples. Many of which also decided that either to earn the trust of the locals or by way of understanding their cultures better, they would be tattooed themselves. Let’s please bear in mind that it would have taken months if not years to sail to the furthest points of the earth at this time, so therefore once the sailors arrived, they would be there for a long time. Once they arrived back on the shores of their homelands, their findings would be taken to all those concerned (generally the aristocratic social structure of the time). Some of these aristocrats thought the body modifications to be “exotic” as they were more often than not intricate, structured pieces which represented kinship and/or rank within a tribe (look at the Maui and Polynesian tattoos of today for a good example of this). It was a way for these people to show that they were interested in the far corners of the world and they would either travel to get tattooed or would employ someone to apply a tattoo of similar style to them. Either way, it was considered to be a luxury and extremely expensive.
Over time, tattoos in the Western world became more popular. People literally took this idea of kinship to heart and this is where, presumably, the idea of criminal and gang tattooing would come into play. In some parts of the world this is still commonplace, particularly in places such as Russia which has a large criminal subculture. Tattoos that you may see on flash sheets in studios and think nothing of tend to have a totally different and more sinister meaning. Whilst some may argue that there is still a large number of law breakers who are heavily tattooed, may we also consider that those sent to concentration camps during the Second World War were also tattooed with their numbers.
Tattoos are not always seen in the same light as how I see them. Ideas and views on tattoos have changed considerably, in a relatively short space of time. Once upon a time they were for sailors and travellers, then viewed upon as exotic, then they gained some sort of criminal tag, then they belonged to the sailors and the travellers again, the Armed Forces in particular and now they are for everyone. The most important aspect to think about is that throughout the ages and in all cultures, tattoos are done through choice.
If you do not want a tattoo because it is not your personal preference, please don’t hold that view against someone who does want one or wears one. Thankfully we live in a world where free-choice operates, where we can do as we please as long as it harms none.
Not too long ago, a new tattoo studio opened in the town that I live in. To say that where I live is very conservative coul be the biggest understatement that I have made to date; they don’t seem to like anything that is a bit different, unless it is culturally acceptible. It is a very small town but has upteen hairdressing studios, a premium supermarket (not just one that everyone can afford to shop in), a load of pubs and restuarants all competing against each other for business, tea rooms, and, well… you get the idea. So for a tattoo studio to open sent many of the residents up in arms.
The residents who tried to oppose this viable business from opening sent out petitions, appealed to the local council, reported it to the Health and Safety Executive, went on a flyering campaign of negative propaganda and failed miserably. The studio now has a very strong and very resilient client base. The opinions of these few, meant that a woman’s reputation in the tattoo-world could well have been put at stake, but they didn’t care because they didn’t want “that image” in “their town”. What image? That all tattooed people are yobs and criminals? I have never committed a crime in my life, I spend my spare time serving the community in which I live, I don’t have a shaved head (OK I drink pints as opposed to delicate lady-sized drinks with a swizzle-stick and a straw) and I am generally an all-round good person who would do anything for anyone.
These residents seem to think that all the children in the local area will be flocking to the shop to get tattooed underage, or that some kind of Pied Piper will be prancing down the street, mesmerising children into following them into the place and having the staff pop a brand mark on them. It doesn’t work like that. There are laws and rules, no one under 18 in the UK can get a tattoo, even with their parents’ permission. No one would ever force anyone to have a tattoo in today’s society because we don’t live in a concentration camp. As for the stereotypical views on who has tattoos, OK you have me there; there are still those who have tattoos out of a kinship towards what they believe in or their choice of lifestyle, but that isn’t everyone. I have a tattoo of a cluster of poppies on my right wrist so that I can pay respect to the fallen soldiers properly in my own way. It shows my affinity with the Armed Forces, but that is part of me. I thought the point of a tattoo is to say something about yourself, where you’re from, what you stand for, what type of art inspires you.
And if anyone says that tattooing is not an art-form, they are simply deluded. There are thousands of artists out there who choose skin as a medium. Many of these have international acclaim and have come from humble beginnings. You have the likes of Ed Hardy, Sailor Jerry, Johnny Two Thumbs, then there are your modern artists such as Xoil, Michael Rose, Victor Portugal, Filip Leu, Jason Stephan, Henrik Gallon, Chris Garcia and Niccku Hori to name but a few. Most of these guys would laugh in your face if you tried to tell them that getting a tattoo was “wrong” or embracing a social subculture. I have met Michael Rose in the flesh, I have been to his studio on the outskirts of North London and it is a fantastic experience. It is clean, it is warm and inviting and above all else, it is professional. Gone are the days of the backstreet tattooist in Britain. The public have demanded proper studios, with hygiene certificates, properly trained apprentices and morals. What I cannot fathom out is why this negative image of tattooing and the tattooed has stuck.
What irritates me even more than the narrow-minded few that clearly know nothing about the craft (and most likely do not wish to know anything about it) is this idea that tattoos can look unprofessional in the workplace. Not too long ago I was looking for work and thought to look at the website for a well-known holiday park which is opening a resort near me. I failed to gain access to the application page because I have a small tattoo (the poppies). While I appreciate that image in this type of employment is very important, I don’t believe that the customers of this holiday company would be particularly bothered if a member of staff was covered head to foot in tattoos as long as they gave excellent customer service and had a permanent smile glued on their face. If anything it gives a lot of people a talking point. Plus many of the customers are likely to have a tattoo themselves so why would anyone take offence to it. I mean, obviously if it was some kind of anti-semitic design or a naked woman with her legs akimbo then, alright I can see how that wouldn’t be appropriate in a place like that, but really?
I know that I have gone on a bit with my argument against the Tattoo Taboo so I will try and keep these last few paragraphs brief; is that people watch these TV shows about tattooing and think that they know everything that there is to know. Ami James (founder of Miami and New York Ink) will tell you himself that the shows are edited, they don’t show people HOW to tattoo and if they mess up one take (e.g. someone swears by accident or whatever) they will take the shoot again.
Hats off to Mr. James and the producers of the show as you have opened the door for many people who never thought that they would actually get a tattoo. Interest in the craft has increased ten-fold, whenever I happen to pass a studio, even in these times of great financial hardship, it is rare to see it empty (unless of course it is closed). It has broadened many horizons in terms of the type of artist available. But on the other hand, there are those trying to make a quick couple of quid off the back of it; “teaching” themselves how to tattoo, or attending a one day course and thinking that they have the skills to tattoo anyone. Again, it doesn’t work like that. Tattooing is a craft, crafts take a long time to learn. Even the most established tattoo artist will tell you that they are learning something new every day.
The first electric tattoo machine was patented in 1891 and would have been really advanced at the time, but now if a tattoo began to apply a design with one, any self-respecting customer would run hard and fast in the opposite direction. There are those companies out there that will tailor a machine to the artist’s needs, or an artist can buy a standard pre-built machine. Some tattoo artists still prefer to build their own machines (this is something that was commonplace from around the 1940s onwards) – generally the members of the Old School variety, the ones that have had many now very well-known names under their rooves, sweeping the floors and making the brews. There are also “machine building” companies cashing in, selling cheap machines with parts that will rust and cause a risk of septicaemia to whoever runs the gauntlet of allowing a tattoo to be applied with one.
So to sum all of this up:
To those who have an obvious dislike for tattoos, think they are vile and repulsive and only serve those from a less-privileged background – GET A LIFE AND GET ON WITH IT – people have been and will always get tattoos, whether it is by compass and ballpoint pen while bored in a maths lesson, whether they have been or still are members of the Armed Forces, whether they are members of some kind of gang or whether they just want to… it is their choice as much as it is yours not to approve. But when a legitimate business comes into your hometown, please for crying out loud do some research before expressing your opinions.
Legimitate studios will always have the appropriate approvals and documentation to support it.
And to all those thinking about getting a tattoo – I suggest again to do some homework, come up with a design that means something to you and go to someone reputable to get it. The result will look incredible on your skin, you can get advice as to how to keep it looking good and you will be much happier than if you buy a cheap kit online and try to do it yourself. Ask the artist if they think your design will work, they will know what looks best as they have years of training behind them and can help you tweak it if need be. Different artists offer different styles and if you have to wait for a booking slot then so be it; there’s a waiting list for a reason. It’s relatively cheap to get a tattoo when you compare it to how much it costs to have one removed.